Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies

Original article:

Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies

Evolutionary Psychology 4: 149-196 Robert O. Deaner, Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3209, Durham, NC 27710, USA, deaner@neuro.duke.eduCarel P. van Schaik, Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057-Zürich, SwitzerlandValen Johnson, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Abstract

Although much recent attention has focused on identifying domain-specific taxonomic differences in cognition, little effort has been directed towards investigating whether domain-general differences also exist. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis of published nonhuman primate cognition studies, testing the prediction that some taxa outperform others across a range of testing situations. First, within each of nine experimental paradigms with interspecific variation, we grouped studies by their procedures and the characteristics of their study subjects. Then, using Bayesian latent variable methods, we tested whether taxonomic differences consistently held within or across paradigms. No genus performed especially well within particular paradigms, but genera differed significantly in overall performance. In addition, there was evidence of variation at higher taxonomic levels; most notably, great apes significantly outperformed other lineages. These results cannot be readily explained by perceptual biases or any other contextual confound and instead suggest that primate taxa differ in some kind of domain-general ability.

Keywords

intelligence, modularity, Bayesian analysis, great apes.

Full article

Download PDF (free)